As I have said (more or less) there are no good choices this election cycle. BUT, if no significant change comes out of it other than the end of the criminal Clinton era, I suppose it's all good? We can likely survive 4 years of a left-wing Republican or socialist president (Obama), but the end of the Clintons would be a major step forward for this country ... let us pray!!!!!

Ok, So the repubicans have allowed the media to scare us into electing McLame as our nominee (it now seems).

I once promised myself I'd never vote for McLame. Easy enough as a senator. I also know I can not vote for a demorat ... at least not among this selection. What am I going to do now???

The simple answer is I'm not sure. I am worried for my country.

If you're like the majority of us, you KNOW the "mainstream media" is very left-wing. Given that, holding it true, what value does any of their endorsements for a Republican have? Assuming, correctly, that left-wing means DemoRat (as a practical matter), a DemoRat would endorse a Republican that 1) could not beat Hillary or Obama, and 2) if by some fluke they did, would be as much like Hillary as possible.

This is why we hear so much about McLame and that preacher moron. The people of South Carolina, God bless them, must just be media gullible. That, and SC is also a primary-cross-over state as well.

I'm hoping that Florida is the beginning of the following Super Tuesday's drive to McLame's road back to angry liberal senator. Maybe even to Arizona waking up and voting him out in '10? Well ... one battle at a time I guess.

Looks like Romney vs. Clinton, looking at early delegate counts. Hehehehe ... screw you McCain!

That bump on the left of his face must be what allows him to speak out of both sides of his mouth!

He seems to be deaf in tonight's debate ... in SO many ways

His comment saying we don't have a declaration of war since WWII proves concretely that he doesn't understand the constitution ... which provides for no such requirement. The permission granted to the president to use force meets the constitutional requirements. I thought previously that Paul was strong on the constitution, and was simply an isolationist. Now that I see he doesn't understand the constitution, combined with his foreign policy views, I see he's just a kook.